Happy Horse 1.1 Image to Video vs Seedance 2.0 Fast Reference to Video
Seedance 2.0 Fast Reference to Video leads on human preference — 1343 vs 1312 Elo (#1 of 79 in the Image-to-Video Arena). The right pick still depends on style, speed and licensing — details below.
Happy Horse 1.1 Image to Videoalibaba/happy-horse/v1.1/image-to-videovs
Seedance 2.0 Fast Reference to Video✓bytedance/seedance-2.0/fast/reference-to-video| Human-preference Elo | 1312 | 1343 |
| Arena rank | #5 of 79 | #1 of 79 |
| Category | image-to-video | image-to-video |
| License | commercial | commercial |
Frequently asked
Is Happy Horse 1.1 Image to Video better than Seedance 2.0 Fast Reference to Video?
By human preference, Seedance 2.0 Fast Reference to Video currently rates higher (1343 vs 1312 Elo). Preference votes measure typical output quality; test both on your own prompts for style fit.
What kind of models are Happy Horse 1.1 Image to Video and Seedance 2.0 Fast Reference to Video?
Both are image to video models available as hosted API endpoints — Happy Horse 1.1 Image to Video (alibaba/happy-horse/v1.1/image-to-video) and Seedance 2.0 Fast Reference to Video (bytedance/seedance-2.0/fast/reference-to-video).
See the full best image-to-video models ranking.