modelgrep

Best LLMs for Instruction Following — inclusionAI

Match · Updated August 2026

The best inclusionAI model for instruction following is Ling-2.6-flash, satisfying 57.4% of IFBench's verifiable prompt constraints. Ling-2.6-1T (56.9%) and Ring-2.6-1T (44.6%) round out the top three.

57.4%IFBench
14.1Intelligence
62 t/sSpeed
$0.010Input /M
262KContext
  1. 1I
    ling-2.6-flash
    ToolsJSON14.1 intel · $0.010/M · 62 t/s
    57.4%
    IFBench
  2. 2I
    ling-2.6-1t
    ToolsJSON26.1 intel · $0.075/M · 36 t/s
    56.9%
    IFBench
  3. 3I
    ring-2.6-1t
    ReasoningToolsJSON30.6 intel · $0.075/M · 60 t/s
    44.6%
    IFBench

How this is ranked

AI models ranked by IFBench — how reliably a model obeys explicit, verifiable constraints in the prompt (format, length, inclusion and exclusion rules). High scores mean fewer retries and less prompt-wrangling in production, which often matters more than raw intelligence for pipelines.

Frequently asked

Which inclusionAI model follows instructions most reliably?

The best inclusionAI model for instruction following is Ling-2.6-flash, satisfying 57.4% of IFBench's verifiable prompt constraints. Ling-2.6-1T (56.9%) and Ring-2.6-1T (44.6%) round out the top three.

What's a good alternative to Ling-2.6-flash?

Ling-2.6-1T (56.9%) is the closest alternative on this metric, followed by Ring-2.6-1T (44.6%). See the full ranking above for the tradeoffs.

How many inclusionAI models are there?

modelgrep tracks 4 inclusionAI models with live benchmarks, speed, latency and per-provider pricing, led on intelligence by Ring-2.6-1T. 3 of them qualify for this ranking.

More inclusionAI rankings

All rankings