Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 wins on more metrics (5 of 8), including intelligence index, gpqa diamond, design arena elo — but the right pick depends on what you optimize for. See the breakdown below.
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 | Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 35.6✓ | 35.3 |
| Coding Index | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 81%✓ | 81% |
| Design Arena Elo | 1274✓ | 1264 |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | 43✓ | 34 |
| Latency | 1.5s✓ | 5.7s |
| Input price /M | $5.00 | $1.20✓ |
| Output price /M | $25.00 | $4.00✓ |
| Context window | 200K | 203K✓ |
| Capabilities | ReasoningToolsJSONVision | ReasoningToolsJSONVision |
Frequently asked
Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 better than Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo?
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 wins on more metrics (5 of 8), including intelligence index, gpqa diamond, design arena elo — but the right pick depends on what you optimize for. See the breakdown below.
What are the biggest differences between Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 and Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo?
The table on this page compares Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 and Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.