Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5 Turbo
Z.ai: GLM 5 Turbo wins on more metrics (4 of 6), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 | Z.ai: GLM 5 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 37.8 | 38.1✓ |
| Coding Index | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 84% | 85%✓ |
| Design Arena Elo | 1333✓ | 1309 |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Input price /M | $5.00 | $1.20✓ |
| Output price /M | $25.00 | $4.00✓ |
| Context window | 1M✓ | 203K |
| Capabilities | ReasoningToolsJSONVision | ReasoningToolsJSON |
Frequently asked
Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 better than Z.ai: GLM 5 Turbo?
Z.ai: GLM 5 Turbo wins on more metrics (4 of 6), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
What are the biggest differences between Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 and Z.ai: GLM 5 Turbo?
The table on this page compares Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 and Z.ai: GLM 5 Turbo metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.