Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 wins on more metrics (5 of 9), including intelligence index, coding index, gpqa diamond — but the right pick depends on what you optimize for. See the breakdown below.
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 | Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 55.7✓ | 54.1 |
| Coding Index | 74.3✓ | 72.2 |
| GPQA Diamond | 92%✓ | 90% |
| Design Arena Elo | 1282✓ | — |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | 88 | 126✓ |
| Latency | 1.8s✓ | 6.3s |
| Input price /M | $5.00 | $1.25✓ |
| Output price /M | $25.00 | $4.25✓ |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M✓ |
| Capabilities | ReasoningToolsJSONVision | ReasoningToolsJSONVisionAudio |
Frequently asked
Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 better than Meta: Muse Spark 1.2?
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 wins on more metrics (5 of 9), including intelligence index, coding index, gpqa diamond — but the right pick depends on what you optimize for. See the breakdown below.
What are the biggest differences between Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 and Meta: Muse Spark 1.2?
The table on this page compares Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 and Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.