Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro wins on more metrics (7 of 7), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 | Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 25.5 | 25.8✓ |
| Coding Index | — | 33.3✓ |
| GPQA Diamond | 70% | 84%✓ |
| Design Arena Elo | 1196 | 1275✓ |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Input price /M | $15.00 | $1.25✓ |
| Output price /M | $75.00 | $10.00✓ |
| Context window | 200K | 1.0M✓ |
| Capabilities | ReasoningToolsVision | ReasoningToolsJSONVisionAudio |
Frequently asked
Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 better than Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro wins on more metrics (7 of 7), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
What are the biggest differences between Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 and Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro?
The table on this page compares Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 and Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.