Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Google: Gemini 2.5 Flashgoogle/gemini-2.5-flashVS
Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instructqwen/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instructGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct are evenly matched; the right pick depends on your priorities.
| Metric | Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 14.1✓ | 13.7 |
| Coding Index | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 68% | 74%✓ |
| Design Arena Elo | 1099✓ | — |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Input price /M | $0.300 | $0.100✓ |
| Output price /M | $2.50 | $1.10✓ |
| Context window | 1.0M✓ | 262K |
| Capabilities | ReasoningToolsJSONVisionAudio | ToolsJSON |
Frequently asked
Is Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?
Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct are evenly matched; the right pick depends on your priorities.
What are the biggest differences between Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?
The table on this page compares Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.