Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Meituan: LongCat 2.0 and Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B are evenly matched; the right pick depends on your priorities.
| Metric | Meituan: LongCat 2.0 | Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 33.5✓ | 32.3 |
| Coding Index | 45.3 | 45.7✓ |
| GPQA Diamond | 78% | 86%✓ |
| Design Arena Elo | — | — |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Input price /M | $0.300 | $0.260✓ |
| Output price /M | $1.20✓ | $2.08 |
| Context window | 1.0M✓ | 262K |
| Capabilities | ReasoningTools | ReasoningToolsJSONVision |
Frequently asked
Is Meituan: LongCat 2.0 better than Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Meituan: LongCat 2.0 and Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B are evenly matched; the right pick depends on your priorities.
What are the biggest differences between Meituan: LongCat 2.0 and Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
The table on this page compares Meituan: LongCat 2.0 and Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.