Meta: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Meta: Llama 3.1 70B Instructmeta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instructVSMeta: Llama 4 Scoutmeta-llama/llama-4-scoutMeta: Llama 4 Scout wins on more metrics (7 of 7), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
| Metric | Meta: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | Meta: Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | — | 10.0✓ |
| Coding Index | — | 8.2✓ |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 59%✓ |
| Design Arena Elo | — | 925✓ |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Input price /M | $0.400 | $0.100✓ |
| Output price /M | $0.400 | $0.300✓ |
| Context window | 131K | 1.3M✓ |
| Capabilities | ToolsJSON | ToolsJSONVision |
Frequently asked
Is Meta: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct better than Meta: Llama 4 Scout?
Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on more metrics (7 of 7), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
What are the biggest differences between Meta: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Meta: Llama 4 Scout?
The table on this page compares Meta: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Meta: Llama 4 Scout metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.