Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Meta: Llama 4 Maverick
Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instructmeta-llama/llama-3.2-1b-instructVSMeta: Llama 4 Maverickmeta-llama/llama-4-maverickMeta: Llama 4 Maverick wins on more metrics (5 of 7), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
| Metric | Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct | Meta: Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | — | 14.3✓ |
| Coding Index | — | 16.3✓ |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 67%✓ |
| Design Arena Elo | — | 957✓ |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Input price /M | $0.027✓ | $0.200 |
| Output price /M | $0.201✓ | $0.800 |
| Context window | 60K | 1.0M✓ |
| Capabilities | ToolsJSONVision |
Frequently asked
Is Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct better than Meta: Llama 4 Maverick?
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick wins on more metrics (5 of 7), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
What are the biggest differences between Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Meta: Llama 4 Maverick?
The table on this page compares Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Meta: Llama 4 Maverick metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.