Meta: Llama 4 Scout vs OpenAI: GPT-4o
Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on more metrics (5 of 6), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
| Metric | Meta: Llama 4 Scout | OpenAI: GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 10.0 | 11.2✓ |
| Coding Index | 8.2✓ | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 59%✓ | 54% |
| Design Arena Elo | 925 | 925 |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Input price /M | $0.100✓ | $2.50 |
| Output price /M | $0.300✓ | $10.00 |
| Context window | 1.3M✓ | 128K |
| Capabilities | ToolsJSONVision | ToolsJSONVision |
Frequently asked
Is Meta: Llama 4 Scout better than OpenAI: GPT-4o?
Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on more metrics (5 of 6), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
What are the biggest differences between Meta: Llama 4 Scout and OpenAI: GPT-4o?
The table on this page compares Meta: Llama 4 Scout and OpenAI: GPT-4o metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.