Meta: Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on more metrics (7 of 7), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
| Metric | Meta: Llama 4 Scout | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 10.0✓ | 9.6 |
| Coding Index | 8.2✓ | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 59%✓ | 49% |
| Design Arena Elo | 925✓ | — |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Input price /M | $0.100✓ | $0.360 |
| Output price /M | $0.300✓ | $0.400 |
| Context window | 1.3M✓ | 33K |
| Capabilities | ToolsJSONVision | ToolsJSON |
Frequently asked
Is Meta: Llama 4 Scout better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?
Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on more metrics (7 of 7), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
What are the biggest differences between Meta: Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?
The table on this page compares Meta: Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.