Meta: Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen: Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on more metrics (5 of 7), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
| Metric | Meta: Llama 4 Scout | Qwen: Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 10.0 | 11.1✓ |
| Coding Index | 8.2✓ | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 59% | 67%✓ |
| Design Arena Elo | 925✓ | — |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Input price /M | $0.100✓ | $0.104 |
| Output price /M | $0.300✓ | $0.416 |
| Context window | 1.3M✓ | 131K |
| Capabilities | ToolsJSONVision | ToolsJSONVision |
Frequently asked
Is Meta: Llama 4 Scout better than Qwen: Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?
Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on more metrics (5 of 7), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
What are the biggest differences between Meta: Llama 4 Scout and Qwen: Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?
The table on this page compares Meta: Llama 4 Scout and Qwen: Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.