Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 wins on more metrics (5 of 8), including design arena elo, speed (tokens/sec), latency — but the right pick depends on what you optimize for. See the breakdown below.
| Metric | Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 | Z.ai: GLM 5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 54.1✓ | 51.1 |
| Coding Index | 72.2✓ | 68.8 |
| GPQA Diamond | 90%✓ | 90% |
| Design Arena Elo | — | 1364✓ |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | 126 | 142✓ |
| Latency | 6.3s | 657ms✓ |
| Input price /M | $1.25 | $0.760✓ |
| Output price /M | $4.25 | $2.42✓ |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Capabilities | ReasoningToolsJSONVisionAudio | ReasoningToolsJSON |
Frequently asked
Is Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 better than Z.ai: GLM 5.2?
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 wins on more metrics (5 of 8), including design arena elo, speed (tokens/sec), latency — but the right pick depends on what you optimize for. See the breakdown below.
What are the biggest differences between Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 and Z.ai: GLM 5.2?
The table on this page compares Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 and Z.ai: GLM 5.2 metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.