OpenAI: GPT-4 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct wins on more metrics (5 of 6), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
| Metric | OpenAI: GPT-4 | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 7.0 | 7.1✓ |
| Coding Index | 13.1✓ | — |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 42%✓ |
| Design Arena Elo | — | — |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Input price /M | $30.00 | $0.660✓ |
| Output price /M | $60.00 | $1.00✓ |
| Context window | 8K | 33K✓ |
| Capabilities | ToolsJSON |
Frequently asked
Is OpenAI: GPT-4 better than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct wins on more metrics (5 of 6), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
What are the biggest differences between OpenAI: GPT-4 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
The table on this page compares OpenAI: GPT-4 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.