Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Z.ai: GLM 4.5V
Z.ai: GLM 4.5V wins on more metrics (3 of 5), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
| Metric | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Z.ai: GLM 4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 7.1✓ | 7.0 |
| Coding Index | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 42% | 57%✓ |
| Design Arena Elo | — | — |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Input price /M | $0.660 | $0.600✓ |
| Output price /M | $1.00✓ | $1.80 |
| Context window | 33K | 66K✓ |
| Capabilities | ReasoningToolsJSONVision |
Frequently asked
Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct better than Z.ai: GLM 4.5V?
Z.ai: GLM 4.5V wins on more metrics (3 of 5), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
What are the biggest differences between Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Z.ai: GLM 4.5V?
The table on this page compares Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Z.ai: GLM 4.5V metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.