Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507VSQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3Bqwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3bQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B wins on more metrics (3 of 5), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
| Metric | Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 | Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | — | 31.6✓ |
| Coding Index | — | 41.9✓ |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84%✓ |
| Design Arena Elo | — | — |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Input price /M | $0.090✓ | $0.140 |
| Output price /M | $0.550✓ | $1.00 |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Capabilities | ToolsJSON | ReasoningToolsJSONVision |
Frequently asked
Is Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 better than Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B?
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B wins on more metrics (3 of 5), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
What are the biggest differences between Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B?
The table on this page compares Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.