Qwen: Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Z.ai: GLM 4.6V
Qwen: Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct wins on more metrics (4 of 5), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
| Metric | Qwen: Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct | Z.ai: GLM 4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 11.1✓ | 11.0 |
| Coding Index | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 67%✓ | 57% |
| Design Arena Elo | — | 1198✓ |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Input price /M | $0.104✓ | $0.300 |
| Output price /M | $0.416✓ | $0.900 |
| Context window | 131K | 131K |
| Capabilities | ToolsJSONVision | ReasoningToolsJSONVision |
Frequently asked
Is Qwen: Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct better than Z.ai: GLM 4.6V?
Qwen: Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct wins on more metrics (4 of 5), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
What are the biggest differences between Qwen: Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct and Z.ai: GLM 4.6V?
The table on this page compares Qwen: Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct and Z.ai: GLM 4.6V metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.