Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo
Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B wins on more metrics (6 of 8), including gpqa diamond, speed (tokens/sec), latency — but the right pick depends on what you optimize for. See the breakdown below.
| Metric | Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B | Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 34.6 | 35.3✓ |
| Coding Index | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 86%✓ | 81% |
| Design Arena Elo | — | 1264✓ |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | 42✓ | 34 |
| Latency | 626ms✓ | 5.7s |
| Input price /M | $0.195✓ | $1.20 |
| Output price /M | $1.56✓ | $4.00 |
| Context window | 262K✓ | 203K |
| Capabilities | ReasoningToolsJSONVision | ReasoningToolsJSONVision |
Frequently asked
Is Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B better than Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo?
Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B wins on more metrics (6 of 8), including gpqa diamond, speed (tokens/sec), latency — but the right pick depends on what you optimize for. See the breakdown below.
What are the biggest differences between Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B and Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo?
The table on this page compares Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B and Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.