Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Z.ai: GLM 4.7
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins on more metrics (4 of 6), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
| Metric | Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B | Z.ai: GLM 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 33.7 | 33.7 |
| Coding Index | 48.2✓ | 45.3 |
| GPQA Diamond | 89%✓ | 86% |
| Design Arena Elo | 1218 | 1251✓ |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Input price /M | $0.390✓ | $0.400 |
| Output price /M | $2.34 | $1.75✓ |
| Context window | 262K✓ | 205K |
| Capabilities | ReasoningToolsJSONVision | ReasoningToolsJSON |
Frequently asked
Is Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B better than Z.ai: GLM 4.7?
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins on more metrics (4 of 6), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
What are the biggest differences between Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Z.ai: GLM 4.7?
The table on this page compares Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Z.ai: GLM 4.7 metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.