Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 wins on more metrics (4 of 7), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
| Metric | Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max | Z.ai: GLM 5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 53.4✓ | 51.1 |
| Coding Index | 68.9✓ | 68.8 |
| GPQA Diamond | 92%✓ | 90% |
| Design Arena Elo | — | 1365✓ |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Input price /M | $2.00 | $0.629✓ |
| Output price /M | $6.00 | $1.98✓ |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M✓ |
| Capabilities | ReasoningToolsJSONVision | ReasoningToolsJSON |
Frequently asked
Is Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max better than Z.ai: GLM 5.2?
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 wins on more metrics (4 of 7), but the right pick depends on what you optimize for — see the breakdown below.
What are the biggest differences between Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max and Z.ai: GLM 5.2?
The table on this page compares Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max and Z.ai: GLM 5.2 metric by metric — intelligence benchmarks, coding score, speed, latency, context window and per-token price — with the winner marked on each row. Data refreshes hourly.